The existence of several parties expressed undoubtedly political pluralism. The countries with single party or permanent party was the Mexican PRI are never democratic. When the word democracy is added to an adjective such as: organic democracy, popular democracy, social democracy or social democracy, which is the noun disappears democracy, which is quite disfigured.
Thanks to political pluralism can be offered to citizens, who, lest we forget, sovereignty resides, various shapes and coexistence solutions to organize and solve problems as they emerge over time. So every four years, which would be subject to consultation of Spanish would be the guidance programs and proposed solutions in a clear and understandable each political party.
The program of each party should be a commitment, a contract with the voters who support it. But in reality not made programs to meet them, and said Tierno Galván, I believe. Once obtained the votes, instead of representing their voters with exact fidelity to the program, every game is dedicated to enjoy the power you get in government or opposition and decide since its domes leaders, not counting at all with voters and times or with its members, on agreements and compromises.
That of which contribute to the formation and expression of the popular will is problematic. Attending to form the popular will make sense when such competition matches plus there was a lively and organized civil society. The isolated individual can not do anything but vote every four years a closed and blocked lists others have cooked, but if you are part of free, non-subsidized, or mediated by a relationship of patronage with the parties, would be worth the weight holders of sovereignty and real control submitted to the government and the opposition.
For society needs freedom to express themselves and a clear framework of legal references. It can not be that citizens are defenseless against the multiple administrations coasted with our taxes. We can not have our government decide for us, without us, on the economy, on morality, on health, on education, on our present and our future. It can not be that we can only express every four years. The voice of organized society must be heard by the rulers permanent and parties, but it is necessary to study, think, reason, do not be manipulated and is independent of government and of the same parties.
If the constitution says that parties are an essential instrument for political participation, we must understand that it is essential that they are just tools and instruments are useful if they serve to realize the political participation of holders of national sovereignty, but if the supplant become instruments of domination and coercion.
Perhaps we should take this into account when ruling party claims that may do what you want with the majority of votes and the main opposition party about changing the political offer made to their voters, thinking that would get the power for the second time he has escaped from his hands. With a more lively and organized this drift would be impossible.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario